28 Nov 2000
It is difficult to write critically about a book that deals with human tragedy.
The review below is one of the few by a non-Cambodian that does so. The author
of the review does not necessarily advocate the KI's position, nor we his; but
he should nevertheless be commended for his courage and honesty. It was forwarded
to us by someone who found it on amazon.
An Unqualified 5 y.o. Adult-Child Narrator, June 18, 2000
Reviewer: Cloud O'Connor from Hawaii
This is one of those very difficult book to review
because it has so many facets: craft, history,
extremely early childhood memories, lost and grief.
The subject is engaging, but the style and literary
effort are not.
While I find the latter parts of the book interesting
because of the humanity, or lack thereof, of Ung's
experiences as a child in a labor camp, I feel
somewhat distracted by her narrative voice in the
first third of the book. Writting about extremely
early childhood memories is a very difficult task (Ung
is a five-year-old at the beginning of the book, and a
ten-year-old at the end). And her voice is somewhat
cumbersome throughout the book. She has what is best
described as an adult-child narrative voice, which, of
course, at times can be profoundly philosophical or
sentimental to the point of being syrupy. I find it
important to keep this in mind when reading her
description of her father, a former government spy and
police chief, as a very kind and loving man--very much
an angel on every account. Naturally given the state
of Southeast Asia at the time (I am well versed in SE
Asia history and culture, having worked, travelled and
worked in the region for over fifteen years), this is
highly unlikely for anyone with such a resume. Also
she describes her family as being middle class. This
is false. Although the middle class is almost
non-existent in Cambodia at the time, no middle class
family can have three cars, several motorcycles and
maids like Ung's family. So what we have here actually
is a conflict in narration. We expect the
"adult-child" narrator describing her experience with
the "assumed" depth and judgment of an adult; however,
Ung uses another approach, one completely devoid of
the honesty and impartially of an adult. Yet, this is
not to say that the suffering Ung and her family
endured in the labor camps were real. Indeed, it was
real, perhaps, even more real than any writer can
fully describe.
This is a good book, an important book; however, I
feel that the author and her editor did not fully
"qualify" the narrative voice. After all, this is
being sold as "non-fiction", "real accounts" and
"survivor's tale". What Ung doesn't remember or know,
she fabricates and speculates in dream sequences. But,
frankly, how many of us remember anything from when we
were five years old, much less with any depth. In the
end, if the editors had paid less attention to the
market force and urge Ung to write more honestly or at
least to qualify her memories, this would have been an
unshakeable work.
Back to Comments List